Well, this is interesting. I hear via the grapevine that my character is being assassinated in private posts by Lakme, and games are being played along the lines of "If you're my friend, you won't be his...".
That sort of stuff is just childish, if that is what's happening. being on the outside of Lakme's journal, and not a part of dotgirl or carrie's journals for quite a while, I don't have the whole story.
Here is my take on it, though, feel free to correct me in polite words if I'm wrong.
Lakme claims that I gave out my password to dotgirl, so she could continue to rea private entries of carrie's. Well, no. I don't give my password out to anyone, unless it's an admin in order to change to a new one. since that's done automatically by LJ, no human has been given it. Now, I'm not calling lakme a liar, because she could just be misinformed.
In all honesty, I do remember enjoying carrie's journal, but there's a lot of fish in the LJ sea, and I really have too many linktos on my friends list anyhow.
I do think it's strange, given Lakme's love of confrontation and combat that she hasn't attacked me publicly with her accusations, which is why I put the disclaimer "grapevine" comment at the front. last conflict I had with her was months ago, about me dropping her from my friends list. I hear that there's some sort of proof, but nobody has seen it. I'll be interested in seeing or hearing what it is, if it exists at all, as I've not done any of what I hear I've been accused of.
Folks who know me, and read both lakme and myself no doubt will see some very real personality differences... I for one, do not delete my journal in an "on-line suicide" in order to get attention from folks that read my journal. I try to work things out, or if that doesn't work, I walk away from the fight, if there's no logic in it.
I don't think of myself as an angry person, or needy for attention. If folks would like to unlink, or link to my page, well, have a nice trip, and welcome aboard respectively. I really don't know the bulk of you folks... most of you are quite nice, friendly, and offer a clever comment or just a friendly wave. I won't be mad if you leave, though. This journal is for me and stuff I find to be fun... you're welcome to visit whenever you like. Longtime linkers here know that my posts are either public or totally private. I think that I've posted probably 5 or so friends only posts, and even then it was pretty much the same as I have here out in public.
This whole "my friend your friend" thing smacks of the politics of high school. Hang with who you want to hang with. Take advice or don't. Good luck with whatever you decide, and I hope you do well.
Just so everyone knows, my journal is staying as long as LJ allows it. People that get outraged with me and my friends are welcome to continue to be so in public or private, but they are not welcome to treat my friends cruelly, unfairly or without kindness.
That sort of stuff is just childish, if that is what's happening. being on the outside of Lakme's journal, and not a part of dotgirl or carrie's journals for quite a while, I don't have the whole story.
Here is my take on it, though, feel free to correct me in polite words if I'm wrong.
Lakme claims that I gave out my password to dotgirl, so she could continue to rea private entries of carrie's. Well, no. I don't give my password out to anyone, unless it's an admin in order to change to a new one. since that's done automatically by LJ, no human has been given it. Now, I'm not calling lakme a liar, because she could just be misinformed.
In all honesty, I do remember enjoying carrie's journal, but there's a lot of fish in the LJ sea, and I really have too many linktos on my friends list anyhow.
I do think it's strange, given Lakme's love of confrontation and combat that she hasn't attacked me publicly with her accusations, which is why I put the disclaimer "grapevine" comment at the front. last conflict I had with her was months ago, about me dropping her from my friends list. I hear that there's some sort of proof, but nobody has seen it. I'll be interested in seeing or hearing what it is, if it exists at all, as I've not done any of what I hear I've been accused of.
Folks who know me, and read both lakme and myself no doubt will see some very real personality differences... I for one, do not delete my journal in an "on-line suicide" in order to get attention from folks that read my journal. I try to work things out, or if that doesn't work, I walk away from the fight, if there's no logic in it.
I don't think of myself as an angry person, or needy for attention. If folks would like to unlink, or link to my page, well, have a nice trip, and welcome aboard respectively. I really don't know the bulk of you folks... most of you are quite nice, friendly, and offer a clever comment or just a friendly wave. I won't be mad if you leave, though. This journal is for me and stuff I find to be fun... you're welcome to visit whenever you like. Longtime linkers here know that my posts are either public or totally private. I think that I've posted probably 5 or so friends only posts, and even then it was pretty much the same as I have here out in public.
This whole "my friend your friend" thing smacks of the politics of high school. Hang with who you want to hang with. Take advice or don't. Good luck with whatever you decide, and I hope you do well.
Just so everyone knows, my journal is staying as long as LJ allows it. People that get outraged with me and my friends are welcome to continue to be so in public or private, but they are not welcome to treat my friends cruelly, unfairly or without kindness.
no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 03:07 pm (UTC)*sigh*
Human nature I suppose. Doesn't mean I have to like it.
Re:
Date: 2001-04-04 03:10 pm (UTC)I'm just trying to clear the air, and make sure none of my pals are being hurt.
(no subject)
From:thanks. :)
From:Re: thanks. :)
From:Re: thanks. :)
From:Re: thanks. :)
From:Re: thanks. :)
From:Re: thanks. :)
From:Re: thanks. :)
From:no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 03:36 pm (UTC)i just gotta say that "disavowed" is a terrific word, and the most accurate one i have heard all day!
Re:
From:Re:
Date: 2001-04-04 03:51 pm (UTC)same folks and situation?
no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 04:04 pm (UTC)You were one of my first friends here and will remain as long as you want. People come and go all the time, that's the world. I like you and the stuff you share with us and the little reminders of being at one with the world as best we can be. It's comforting to know that at least one person out there really does give a damn about things.
Re:
Date: 2001-04-04 04:11 pm (UTC)I appreciate your kind words.
Re:
From:Re:
From:no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 04:17 pm (UTC)I didn't attack you publically because I didn't see the need. I wanted to warn my friends that I share with you that you weren't to be trusted with private entries, because you let Penny see Carrie's.
You can deny it till the sky falls. But Penny told me it was you when I was in her good graces. She specifically mentioned on ICQ one day that she was glad you had gotten back on Carrie's friends list. She named you by name.
I told Carrie when we reconciled. She removed you for the second time. We were sitting on ICQ talking, and Penny tried to view the private entries and suddenly had no access. You were the only person removed at this point.
Penny is a lot of things, but she's not prone to lying, especially when she's bragging about how she stalks Carrie. It says very much when you are removed, and suddenly she has no access when previously she did. I think you did it. I think it's plain and simple.
I don't know you, and I have nothing against you save for that. It is plain old wrong to give out anyone's private entries. I told my friends because I didn't want them to have the same thing happen-plenty of them have stalkers of their own to worry about. What they choose to do is up to them.
But I will point out that I have better things to do than to make up lies about you. I don't know you. There would be no point to that. It was simply out of concern for my friends. I didn't want you doing this to someone else.
I have no patience for liars and sneaks, and if you'd do that to Carrie, what would stop you from doing it to someone else?
Re:
Date: 2001-04-04 04:47 pm (UTC)You're welcome to think what you like, but it seems to me that drawing those conclusions might be pretty presumptuous. Who knows what dotgirl had in her cache before reloading it?
I wouldn't give my password out, so, no worries there. I'm not in the business of hurting people. Perhaps in the future you can do a little more research before slandering someone? I think if you look at my character, you'll see that I'm not interested in being cruel.
Thank you for answering my request for more information, and keeping it civil.
no subject
(insert large smirk here)
Re:
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 04:34 pm (UTC)The conclusion is mine and I take full responsiblity for it. And I claim my right to it. I also, under all circumstances claim my right to choose who my friends are and to refuse to participate in tests of loyalty and friendship.
The last two days have really sucked. I am hurt and I am sad. But I would do it again in a heartbeat. I have no choice, because to do otherwise would be be untrue to myself.
Re:
Date: 2001-04-04 04:53 pm (UTC)Something that surprises me is how many people didn't let me know *didn't * let me know I was being badmouthed.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:Re:
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:what I disagree on.
From:Re: what I disagree on.
From:Re: what I disagree on.
From:no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 04:41 pm (UTC)I'm on hiatus from LJ for a while, but this was called to my attention by some friends, and I wanted to address it. I don't mind sitting by and letting myself be badmouthed, but I'm not about to let it happen to a perfectly innocent person.
As for the clamouring to know who *did* give me the password - I'm sorry, but that is not going to happen. If the person comes forward of their own accord, that's fine, but it is not my right to out anyone.
Re:
Date: 2001-04-04 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 05:00 pm (UTC)You told me flat out it was him, and as soon as Carrie removed him, you couldn't get in anymore. (for a while, anyway, until you found a new source) You probably have the conversation saved somewhere. I don't. I deleted you long ago, and I'm a luddite, so I'd have no idea how to retrieve such a thing.
I don't know why you'd bother continuing with your stalking. It's been obvious you have found many sources and ways to get in. First you claimed it was Mere, then Scott. Who else?
Unless you're lying about people because they are convienient, you really shouldn't protect the people who helped you with this. It's wrong. You know it. Why not stop your madness while you can?
awesome
I think someone owes you an apology big time, but I wouldn't hold my breath about getting it.....
And you know, anybody who really knows you, knows that those accusations are total bullshit, even if Dotgirl didn't come forward. Your friends believed and this was well before Dotgirl's post.
You prevailed, and you didn't have to do anything but be yourself. I think that says a lot.
Re: awesome
Date: 2001-04-04 05:06 pm (UTC)I'm very happy that the cooler heads prevailed. Stupidity could have turned it ugly.
Re: awesome
Date: 2001-04-04 10:13 pm (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 06:45 pm (UTC)Explanation:
I'm not prone to lying. I am just a stalker.
Good Grief! Did I stumble onto my old high school's webpage with angsty teens who are always at the ready to spread the unknown, or?
no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 07:55 pm (UTC)how does this high drama occur exactly??
(i was wondering because...dude my life is boring i need to get me some excitement...er..something...)
sorry dont mean to make light of the subject...
i have had my journal since august and not one single time have i had an issue with anyone.
of course i am 25 and left the 6th grade along time ago.
scotto you rock the free world...newt too :D
Re:
Date: 2001-04-04 07:56 pm (UTC)This is the first time I've seen this sort of high drama firsthand, m'self.
I'm glad it was resolved within an hour of my finding it. :)
no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 08:37 pm (UTC)I simply had no idea that it was you being implicated. The thought... strikes me as ludicrous, it really does.
I'm so so so so so so so so glad I didn't open my mouth and get myself involved. I really dislike all this nonsense.
*hugs*
no subject
Date: 2001-04-04 11:21 pm (UTC)The people that matter believe you anyway scotto..
Re:
Date: 2001-04-05 07:25 am (UTC)I honestly feel it's over with. They were proved wrong, and they apologised.
no subject
Date: 2001-04-05 03:18 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-04-05 07:23 am (UTC)thanks for the hugs!
*hugs*
(no subject)
From:Re: Goodness!
Date: 2001-04-06 05:41 pm (UTC)thanks for your kind words!