![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
scottobear
Lovely cyberman cameo in the Dalek episode of Dr. Who. Also, more "Bad Wolf" imagery. (Just an In-joke?) Rather my least favorite one so far, but it was still worth a watch.
Moment of lyric -
And you know it like a poet, like baby doll
I bet she tried to say she gave me her all, she played ball
All bets off! The Villain got the dice rigged
And they say he accosted the man with the sliced wig
Allegedly; the investigation is still ongoing
In this pesky inition he gots the best con flowin'
The pot doubles, now they really got troubles
Madman never go *pop*!, like snot bubbles
Someone remixed a bunch of President Bush speeches and rearranged his words so that it sounds like he's singing "Imagine" and "A Walk On The Wild Side." (part of an entire album called The Party Party. Download it here.) via boingboing
Awesome.
I still think a freshly baptized baby (Especially if still wet from the fount) would be an awesome weapon against a vampire. Actually, I wonder how great a recently baptized born-again martial artist with a sharpened wooden leg would probably be the best. While wearing a Crucifix. At High Noon. In the Desert. On a clear day.
After the club, I went to see Sahara... it was a cute, dumb action film. Quite enjoyable. Solid Dirk Pitt fare.
I was complimented on my gentleness on Saturday, and was reminded that the Spanish word for toad is sapo (frog is rana). I can communicate in Spanish like a first-grader.
(El nombre de mi gato es Newton y él es anaranjado.)
During walkabout yesterday, a coconut nearly dented my noggin, and landed on the sidewalk with a really solid *THUNK* . If Isaac Newton lived further South, he'd have just discovered a concussion rather than a theory about gravity. If I was about 2 feet to the right, Newton-cat would've had to wait a while before a litte change.
Travel Pictures:
Cute little munchkin on the bus. We played at making silly faces the whole way up.
more sticky letter graffiti, right on the bus. TRIK
Pulp book Covers
They're coming for you, Barbara.
Your Geek Profile: |
| Academic Geekiness: High |
| Internet Geekiness: High |
| Movie Geekiness: High |
| Music Geekiness: High |
| Fashion Geekiness: Moderate |
Your Travel Profile: |
You Are Well Traveled in the Northeastern United States (57%) |
You Are Well Traveled in the Southern United States (46%) |
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in the Midwestern United States (25%) |
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in Western Europe (21%) |
You Are Mostly Untraveled in Eastern Europe (20%) |
You Are Mostly Untraveled in Latin America (13%) |
You Are Mostly Untraveled in the Western United States (11%) |
You Are Mostly Untraveled in Southern Europe (7%) |
You Are Untraveled in Africa (0%) |
You Are Untraveled in Asia (0%) |
You Are Untraveled in Australia (0%) |
You Are Untraveled in Canada (0%) |
You Are Untraveled in New Zealand (0%) |
You Are Untraveled in Scandinavia (0%) |
You Are Untraveled in the Middle East (0%) |
You Are Untraveled in the United Kingdom (0%) |
1 year ago - nuptials, 5/5, bad dream, vanishment poll, quizzes
2 years ago - highlander badgers, 20q, misc news stories, Newton at Rate my kitten, CJ issues
3 years ago - lovey day, PBJ time, remote rats, plant caregiving
4 years ago - misc news, sleep station with newt, TCUP
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 01:44 pm (UTC)Cute way to be mauled to death, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 03:03 pm (UTC)I'm glad she didn't get rabies, or worse!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 03:38 pm (UTC)and I've seen my share of both.
Although... I'm still more afraid of sharks than I am of coconuts.
More people die of pig attacks than shark attacks, too, I hear!
via straight dope
Date: 2005-05-02 05:45 pm (UTC)For 20 years scientists have been saying you have a better chance of getting killed by a falling coconut than by whatever lethal life form they were getting big bucks to study. In 1984, for example, this column quoted Dr. Merlin Tuttle, curator of mammals at the Milwaukee Public Museum and founder of Bat Conservation International, on the chances of being bitten by a bat versus death due to various misadventures (getting poisoned at a church picnic, murdered by your spouse, or bitten by a rabid dog or cat). Having worked up a head of steam, Dr. Tuttle thundered, "Statistically, you have a better chance in this country of dying from being hit on the head with a coconut than from a bat biting you."
Now scientists are rallying round the misunderstood shark. In late May, George Burgess, director of the Florida Museum of Natural History's International Shark Attack File and a noted shark researcher, was quoted as saying, "Falling coconuts kill 150 people worldwide each year, 15 times the number of fatalities attributable to sharks."
Re: via straight dope
Date: 2005-05-02 05:45 pm (UTC)When I called Burgess, he told me he had gotten this statistic off the Internet--specifically, from a widely reported press release from the British travel-insurance firm Club Direct, saying that "holidaymakers hit by falling coconuts will be guaranteed full cover under their travel insurance policy. The news follows reports from Queensland, Australia, that coconut trees are being uprooted by local councils fearful of being sued for damages by people injured by coconuts. . . . 'Coconuts kill around 150 people worldwide each year, which makes them about ten times more dangerous than sharks,' says Brent Escott, managing director of Club Direct."
So, Brent, do coconuts kill ten times as many people as sharks, or fifteen? No response yet from the UK. However, Club Direct's release also cites an article by Dr. Peter Barss in the Journal of Trauma entitled "Injuries Due to Falling Coconuts." (The article received an Ig Nobel Prize, given annually at Harvard by the editors of the Annals of Improbable Research in recognition of research that "cannot or should not be replicated." The award was presented in 2001, notwithstanding that the paper had been published in 1984. Apparently news takes a while to filter through to Cambridge.) The article soberly reported on nine injuries in Papua New Guinea due to falling coconuts, none fatal. Barss notes that a coconut palm tree commonly reaches 25 meters in height, that a coconut can weigh two kilograms or more, and that a two-kilogram coconut falling 25 meters would have a velocity of 80 kilometers per hour on impact and a force of as much as 1,000 kilograms. Several victims suffered fractured skulls, were rendered comatose, etc.
OK, getting hit by a coconut is no laughing matter. But nowhere does Barss say that 150 people get killed by coconuts each year. He provides an anecdotal account of one such death and in a separate paper estimates that over a four-year period five deaths in his hospital's service area were related to coconut palm trees (including climbers falling out of them). A recent report (Mulford et al, "Coconut Palm-Related Injuries in the Pacific Islands," ANZ Journal of Surgery, January 2001), which describes itself as "the largest review of coconut-palm related injuries," also reports no deaths and on the question of mortality merely cites Barss. Given that Barss' hospital in Papua New Guinea served a population of 130,000, one conceivably could project 150 deaths over that portion of the world population living in proximity to coconut palm trees, but I'm not aware of any systematic attempt to do so. Noting that death reports in tropical countries are limited, Barss tells me, "I am surprised that someone has come up with an actual number for such injuries. It must be a crude estimate, and you would have to ask them what methodology they used to verify whether it has any validity." Conclusion: Somebody pulled the figure about 150 deaths due to coconuts out of thin air. Take that, shark lovers.
Barss, incidentally, wrote numerous frightening reports while stationed in the tropics. His subjects included injuries by pigs in Papua New Guinea, penetrating wounds caused by needlefish in Oceania, scombroid fish poisoning at Ala Tau, grass-skirt burns, wound necrosis caused by the venom of stingrays, and inhalation hazards of tropical "pea shooters." He's now teaching at United Arab Emirates University, in a desert city built around an ancient date oasis. Can't blame him for making the switch--who ever heard of getting KO'd by a falling date?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 04:39 pm (UTC)Your Geek Profile:
Academic Geekiness: High
Fashion Geekiness: Moderate
Geekiness in Love: Moderate
Movie Geekiness: Moderate
General Geekiness: Low
How Geeky Are You?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 04:40 pm (UTC)yucatan! Yucca flats! kumkquat!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 07:14 pm (UTC)Man-thing is really a rogue tribe of Raccoons.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 07:30 pm (UTC)man, they're cukoo for hot dog buns.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 06:32 pm (UTC)They're a cuddly mob of EVIL!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 07:07 pm (UTC)Hmm.. lawyers or rabid rodents...
tough call! :D
no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 12:19 am (UTC)laughed myself stupid at the raccoon caption
Date: 2005-05-05 05:27 pm (UTC)*****
Your Geek Profile:
Academic Geekiness: High (ssh! tell no one)
Movie Geekiness: High (figures!)
Geekiness in Love: Moderate (thank god)
Fashion Geekiness: Low (ditto)
Internet Geekiness: Low (i suspect this one is misleading)
Music Geekiness: Low (yea!)
SciFi Geekiness: Low (there is hope for me yet)
Gamer Geekiness: None
General Geekiness: None
***************
i've got some travelling catch up to do..
You Are Very Well Traveled in the Midwestern United States (75%)
You Are Very Well Traveled in the Northeastern United States (71%)
You Are Well Traveled in the Southern United States (54%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in Canada (40%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in the United Kingdom (25%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in the Western United States (21%)
You Are Mostly Untraveled in Latin America (13%)
You Are Mostly Untraveled in Southern Europe (7%)
You Are Mostly Untraveled in Western Europe (7%)
You Are Untraveled in Africa (0%)
You Are Untraveled in Asia (0%)
You Are Untraveled in Australia (0%)
You Are Untraveled in Eastern Europe (0%)
You Are Untraveled in New Zealand (0%)
You Are Untraveled in Scandinavia (0%)
You Are Untraveled in the Middle East (0%)
Re: laughed myself stupid at the raccoon caption
Date: 2005-05-05 07:57 pm (UTC)Re: laughed myself stupid at the raccoon caption
Date: 2005-05-05 07:58 pm (UTC)