Censorship in the news....
Sep. 13th, 2000 12:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
scottobearNEW YORK (AP) - Harry Potter made the list. So did The Catcher in the Rye and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. The most popular children's books? No. The ones adults most wanted removed from library shelves in the 1990s.
"This just proves no book is safe from censorship attempts," said Judith Krug, director of the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom. The top 100 titles - including The Handmaid's Tale, by acclaimed Canadian author Margaret Atwood - were compiled and released in advance of the 20th annual Banned Books Week, which runs Sept. 23-30.
The ALA, the American Booksellers Association and the American Society of Journalists and Authors are among the sponsors.
The most disputed books were the popular Scary Stories titles, horror tales by the late Alvin Schwartz. Objections included violence, cannibalism and causing children to fear the dark. A complaint from the school district in Campbell County, Wyo., said the books made kids believe "ghosts are actually possible."
Also in the top 10 were such classroom standards as Maya Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye, John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men and Mark Twain's The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
"The fact that teachers assign them is one of the reasons there's so much concern," Krug said. "They deal with issues a lot of parents don't want to know about."
The Harry Potter series, which Christian groups have attacked because of its themes of witchcraft and wizardry, comes in at No. 48. It was removed this year from a public school in Bridgeport Township, Mich.
According to the ALA, more than 5,000 complaints were recorded at school and public libraries in the 1990s. Krug said that represents about 20 per cent to 25 per cent of all challenges, although she does note the annual number has declined slightly over the past years.
"A lot of people are now spending more time thinking about Internet content," she said.
"Sexually explicit" was the most common objection raised about books at libraries, followed by "unsuited to age group" and "occult theme or promoting the occult or Satanism." Others included violence, promotion of same-sex relationships, racism and anti-family values.
Krug said about 5 per cent of those complaints lead to a book being banned.
"Usually, when the rest of the community hears about a complaint it speaks out in support of keeping the book," she said.
But many books, even famous ones, do get removed. In 1997, Angelou's memoir was taken off the ninth-grade English curriculum in Anne Arundel County, Md., because it "portrays white people as being horrible, nasty, stupid people."
In 1993, Catcher in the Rye was removed from a California school district because it "centred around negative activity." Four years later, the superintendent of the Marysville, Calif., Joint Unified School District banned Salinger's novel "so that we didn't have that polarization over a book."
The list includes such children's favourites as Maurice Sendak's In the Night Kitchen and R.L. Stine's Goosebumps series. Acclaimed adult novels on the list include Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five and Nobel laureate Toni Morrison's Beloved.
Also cited are William Golding's The Lord of the Flies, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, removed in 1996 from an advanced placement English reading list in Lindale, Texas, because it "conflicted with the values of the community."
"This just proves no book is safe from censorship attempts," said Judith Krug, director of the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom. The top 100 titles - including The Handmaid's Tale, by acclaimed Canadian author Margaret Atwood - were compiled and released in advance of the 20th annual Banned Books Week, which runs Sept. 23-30.
The ALA, the American Booksellers Association and the American Society of Journalists and Authors are among the sponsors.
The most disputed books were the popular Scary Stories titles, horror tales by the late Alvin Schwartz. Objections included violence, cannibalism and causing children to fear the dark. A complaint from the school district in Campbell County, Wyo., said the books made kids believe "ghosts are actually possible."
Also in the top 10 were such classroom standards as Maya Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye, John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men and Mark Twain's The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
"The fact that teachers assign them is one of the reasons there's so much concern," Krug said. "They deal with issues a lot of parents don't want to know about."
The Harry Potter series, which Christian groups have attacked because of its themes of witchcraft and wizardry, comes in at No. 48. It was removed this year from a public school in Bridgeport Township, Mich.
According to the ALA, more than 5,000 complaints were recorded at school and public libraries in the 1990s. Krug said that represents about 20 per cent to 25 per cent of all challenges, although she does note the annual number has declined slightly over the past years.
"A lot of people are now spending more time thinking about Internet content," she said.
"Sexually explicit" was the most common objection raised about books at libraries, followed by "unsuited to age group" and "occult theme or promoting the occult or Satanism." Others included violence, promotion of same-sex relationships, racism and anti-family values.
Krug said about 5 per cent of those complaints lead to a book being banned.
"Usually, when the rest of the community hears about a complaint it speaks out in support of keeping the book," she said.
But many books, even famous ones, do get removed. In 1997, Angelou's memoir was taken off the ninth-grade English curriculum in Anne Arundel County, Md., because it "portrays white people as being horrible, nasty, stupid people."
In 1993, Catcher in the Rye was removed from a California school district because it "centred around negative activity." Four years later, the superintendent of the Marysville, Calif., Joint Unified School District banned Salinger's novel "so that we didn't have that polarization over a book."
The list includes such children's favourites as Maurice Sendak's In the Night Kitchen and R.L. Stine's Goosebumps series. Acclaimed adult novels on the list include Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five and Nobel laureate Toni Morrison's Beloved.
Also cited are William Golding's The Lord of the Flies, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, removed in 1996 from an advanced placement English reading list in Lindale, Texas, because it "conflicted with the values of the community."
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2000-09-13 11:15 am (UTC)censorship
Date: 2000-09-13 11:51 am (UTC)Re: censorship
Date: 2000-09-13 12:21 pm (UTC)I think it is the governments place
to legislate certain basic rights for children and to protect them from certain harms and to help their parents protect and educate them.
For example. I dont believe it should be a father's right to take pornographic pictures of his son or daughter and sell them on the web.
Nor do I believe it should be the parents right to decide that their children do not need anything beyond a second grade education.
But I do believe it is okay for adults/parents to be provided with guidelines similair to one they have at the movies for video games, music and even reading material so they can decide if they feel like their children should be subject to it. And when it comes to a school and what teachers will be teaching your children in a classroom then parents definitely have the right to disagree. Parents can then get together and make a decision based on what the majority wants.
Except when their decisions could be violating other students civil rights.
This might not be ideal for every student but it is how we can have all the students together in the same room learning the same thing. IF a parent is upset that the school has censored Huckleberry Finn (which I would be) then they need to speak out to the appropriate people and spend time making a compelling arguement (which I would).
Im not disagreeing that every bit of information available to an adult should be avaiable to a child. It just shouldnt nessecarily be available in a school nor taught to a child without a parents permission.