![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
scottobearBasic cruelty by those in power seems to be an element of human design. (Fortunately I've encountered a few exceptions.)
In 'The Glass Teat' Harlan Ellison recounts a story he says he got from Mattel insiders involved in product testing. A doll was made that upped the ante on the usual wetting and crying, making the reactions a bit more interactive. When rocked gently or given a bottle it would gurgle and coo, but when treated roughly or spanked it would cry.
The test children quickly learned which stimulus would provide which reaction, and also quickly decided which was more fun. Soon the only response coming from the dolls were cries as the children found new ways to trigger them.
Apocryphal, I know, but consistent with what I've seen.
Yes, you don't often see little girls torturing their dollies, but those dollies don't cry. There's something about a victim begging for mercy that seems to throw some malignant switch in homo sapiens.
It reminds me a little of the Stanford Prison Experiment. A good overview with pictures and some short video is here.
Briefly, in order to study some aspects of prisons volunteers agreed to play guards and prisoners for at $15 a day for 1-2 weeks. A hallway and some small rooms in the Psych building were made into a "prison" with CCTV monitoring. The students were arbitrarily divided into two groups by a flip of the coin. Half were randomly assigned to be guards, the other to be prisoners.
"Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison life had to be ended prematurely after only six days because of what the situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed and showed signs of extreme stress."
In 'The Glass Teat' Harlan Ellison recounts a story he says he got from Mattel insiders involved in product testing. A doll was made that upped the ante on the usual wetting and crying, making the reactions a bit more interactive. When rocked gently or given a bottle it would gurgle and coo, but when treated roughly or spanked it would cry.
The test children quickly learned which stimulus would provide which reaction, and also quickly decided which was more fun. Soon the only response coming from the dolls were cries as the children found new ways to trigger them.
Apocryphal, I know, but consistent with what I've seen.
Yes, you don't often see little girls torturing their dollies, but those dollies don't cry. There's something about a victim begging for mercy that seems to throw some malignant switch in homo sapiens.
It reminds me a little of the Stanford Prison Experiment. A good overview with pictures and some short video is here.
Briefly, in order to study some aspects of prisons volunteers agreed to play guards and prisoners for at $15 a day for 1-2 weeks. A hallway and some small rooms in the Psych building were made into a "prison" with CCTV monitoring. The students were arbitrarily divided into two groups by a flip of the coin. Half were randomly assigned to be guards, the other to be prisoners.
"Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison life had to be ended prematurely after only six days because of what the situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed and showed signs of extreme stress."
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
How true
Re: How true
Date: 2001-10-27 08:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-27 08:23 am (UTC)I'm amazed I graduated with that degree with any faith in humanity left at all ;-)
Re:
Date: 2001-10-27 08:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-27 08:28 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-10-27 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-27 10:31 am (UTC)i think power is so corrupting in america because we have a culture where we learn that you're either the person in power or the person that someone has power over, and that if you're the one that isn't in power, you're likely to get screwed badly. from the time we're young children we are taught that it's best to be the one with power, and that if we do have power, we can get away with doing just about anything we want to.
Re:
Date: 2001-10-27 10:41 am (UTC)If you think power is corrupting in America, take a gander at Africa or South America sometime. :) I think that culture extends back far into the past... when "might makes right" was the most expediant option for a society.
no subject
Date: 2001-10-27 10:54 am (UTC)which african and south american societies are you talking about? and do you mean in the present or pre-colonization?
Re:
Date: 2001-10-27 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-27 11:06 am (UTC)i'm guessing that for pre-colonized south america you're thinking of the inca? (probably the aztec and the maya too, though they were/are [there are still plenty of descendents of the maya around] in central america :)) i'm still curious as to which african societies you're thinking of.
i can think of a number of native north american societies and pacific islander societies, for example, that were fairly equal.
Re:
Date: 2001-10-27 11:15 am (UTC)The dogma of "otherness" doesn't work well for me. I need to see cited examples, or proof of different behavior. Equality doesn't mean cruelty-free.
But, regardless, we're getting away from the point of my post. I have little doubt in my mind that selfishness and 'bully-factor' is a part of human design. I think it's a leftover survival element. What we do with it is another matter entirely... suppress it, channel it, or just use it as a weapon.
no subject
Date: 2001-10-27 11:54 am (UTC)From what little I've seen, such behaviour is often based on what one learns in childhood (like so much else, behaviourally-speaking).
I find the subject absolutely fascinating.