scottobear: (Default)
[personal profile] scottobear
The socially retarded, the chronically clueless, and the impolite.

you know I love 'em.

The only thing that can help someone like that is a well-trained staff of retard handlers and a toy duck that squirts chocolate when you squeeze it.

Date: 2001-10-04 07:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lonita.livejournal.com
You didn't mean me, did you? :> Wait, maybe I shouldn't have asked; you might give me an answer I don't want to hear.

It's all good. I know I'm iggerant. :>

Re:

Date: 2001-10-04 07:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
nah, I mean folks who reply to a person's lj post that was put up with coments disabled...in another post of thiers.

if comments are disabled, just for that post, you'd think they don't want to hear comments on it... you're not a dip, as far as I've seen!!

Date: 2001-10-04 07:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lonita.livejournal.com
Well not to the point where I'd put my tongue on something metallic in sub-zero temperatures, no; but I have my moments. Trust me.

Yeah, usually the "wet paint" sign is there for a reason. Usually it means, uhm, "wet paint". People not only _don't_ have a clue, they don't _want_ to have a clue.

Re:

Date: 2001-10-04 07:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
yeah...

wet paint is a statement, not a request.

Date: 2001-10-04 07:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lonita.livejournal.com
Oh don't be so so... I've been up all night. If I could spell my own name properly, it'd be a miracle. :>

I'm going nappy now.

Re:

Date: 2001-10-04 08:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
heehee.. no, I was thinking about a cartoon I saw of a man urinating on a wall that had a "wet paint" sign.

no slight meant against you.

Date: 2001-10-04 07:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lonita.livejournal.com
And it's not dippyness, far as I can tell. With people who ignore the "no comments" sign, it's more a case of being rude and fucking retarded.

Re:

Date: 2001-10-04 07:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
*nods... a socially retarded critter, he is.

Date: 2001-10-04 07:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] artemii.livejournal.com
wow, that's really lame.

Re:

Date: 2001-10-04 07:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
dern tootin' .

Date: 2001-10-04 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zarb.livejournal.com
Yes, when someone posts a post with no comments attached to it... I understand that they may not want comments on it.. however, depending what the post is, sometimes your heart just goes out to them and you want them to know that you care. And I know, when I see one of my friends (whether online or in rl) hurting I want to help in any way I can... whether that means a 3:00am phone call or an email...

I did not email nor post to my friend who had a no post, post.. not that I remember anyways.. :)

Re:

Date: 2001-10-04 08:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
yeah, this was an opinion piece, and the person's reply was far from helpful.
(deleted comment)

Re:

Date: 2001-10-05 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
oh, and you too!

Profile

scottobear: (Default)
scott von berg

April 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2 345678
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 1718 19 20 21 22
23 2425 26 2728 29
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 20th, 2026 04:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios