(no subject)
Apr. 25th, 2001 06:49 amage of sexual consent, around the world.
some odd observations... new mexico... legal to have same sex relationships earlier? 17 for opposite sex, 13 for same... I guess the main dilemma is pregnancy, in that case.
13? am I alone in thinking that's a little young for anyone? and in some countries, it's more accepted for a woman to be younger and mate than a man... 12 years for a girl, 17 for a boy, in a few cases.
Not too keen on the purpose of the page (I think it's so horndogs can get away with making out with minors) but the information there is an interesting breakdown.
some odd observations... new mexico... legal to have same sex relationships earlier? 17 for opposite sex, 13 for same... I guess the main dilemma is pregnancy, in that case.
13? am I alone in thinking that's a little young for anyone? and in some countries, it's more accepted for a woman to be younger and mate than a man... 12 years for a girl, 17 for a boy, in a few cases.
Not too keen on the purpose of the page (I think it's so horndogs can get away with making out with minors) but the information there is an interesting breakdown.
no subject
Date: 2001-04-25 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-04-25 08:07 am (UTC)Just like a VCR has valid uses that don't involve massive copyright violations.
Displaying information of any kind is not inherently bad. If the page had porn ads and had other wording, yes, it would be a problem; but I think you're finding fault where there is none.
Re:
Date: 2001-04-25 08:37 am (UTC)It does have a porn ad at the top, but it's fairly innocuous. I feel very strongly that the purpose is to protect folks that want to have sex with minors, but I could be mentally filtering that way. I do agree freedom of knowledge is quite important.