7557 -

Jul. 13th, 2005 06:27 am
scottobear: (Hello from bro - surfing)
[personal profile] scottobear



Bro stopped by, his cell phone drowned in the hurricane. He seems to be doing a lot better... so he's at least in an up-phase. He took a quick shower and we joked about old times... it was a good thing. I gave him my 4th of july blood donor shirt, and he went up Las Olas to look for some work at the nearby bars. Hopefully he'll get some green under the table. He's braced for his court date next Monday. I'm surprised...l I thought he'd run, but it looks like he's planning on hitting it face on.



Good Experience Games - I really dig proximity. (I've already grabbed the flash file, and have it on the palmtop.)



On Sunday, Newsweek magazine revealed that Karl Rove, the President's key political advisor, was responsible for disclosing the identity of undercover CIA agent Valerie Plame.1 Rove's lawyer has confirmed that he was involved.2

Last year, President Bush promised that anyone at the White House involved in the leak would be fired.3 We believe that the President should stick to his word. That's why we're calling on him to fire Karl Rove.

Sign the petition to Bush right now at:
http://www.moveonpac.org/firerove/?id=5782-943837-JD8X9IUVGSKVeWWGzk7LLg&t=1

Valerie Plame was an operative working on stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction—the most important beat at the CIA and one of the most important jobs in the country.4 Rove revealed her identity and destroyed her network of connections to settle a political score. He weakened America's national security. For that alone, he deserves to be fired.

Press Secretary Scott McClellan told the press in September of 2003, when the story first broke, that anyone at the White House who was involved would be fired "at a minimum."5 And when asked on June 10th, 2004, if he would "stand by your pledge to fire anyone found" to have leaked the agent's name, President Bush responded, simply, "Yes."6

Of course, in the past the White House has strenuously denied that Rove had anything to do with it. In 2003, McClellan said that he'd asked Rove if he was involved, and Rove had said he wasn't.7 "The president knows that Karl Rove wasn't involved."8 "I've made it very clear, he was not involved, that there's no truth to the suggestion that he was."9 Asked again if Rove was involved, McClellan responded, "That's just totally ridiculous."10

So what did McClellan have to say about the clear discrepancies between what the President Bush and he had said in 2003 and what Newsweek reported on Sunday? Nothing. Here's an excerpt from the transcript:

Q: Do you want to retract your statement that Rove, Karl Rove, was not involved in the Valerie Plame expose?

A: I appreciate the question. This is an ongoing investigation at this point. The president directed the White House to cooperate fully with the investigation, and as part of cooperating fully with the investigation, that means we're not going to be commenting on it while it is ongoing.

Q: But Rove has apparently commented, through his lawyer, that he was definitely involved.

A: You're asking me to comment on an ongoing investigation.

Q: I'm saying, why did you stand there and say he was not involved?

A: Again, while there is an ongoing investigation, I'm not going to be commenting on it nor is ... .

Q: Any remorse?11

It's worth noting that both Bush and McClellan have commented on the case repeatedly since 2003.12

Republicans claim that the furor over this case is just politics as usual. But what Rove did has serious ramifications. Here's the story in a nutshell: In 2002, former Ambassador Joe Wilson was sent by the CIA to investigate rumors that Saddam Hussein had attempted to purchase uranium from Niger. Wilson found nothing, and wrote about it in a New York Times op-ed column on July 6, 2003 after President Bush used the claim as part of the case for war. Wilson was married to Valerie Plame, an undercover operative, who was revealed shortly thereafter by conservative columnist Robert Novak. Novak cited "senior administration officials" as his source that Plame was an operative.13

Why out Plame? While we don't know the full story, there are a couple of reasons to do so: to exact revenge on Wilson for refusing to toe the Administration line, and to send a message to would-be whistle-blowers that they should keep their mouths shut.

In any case, Plame's work was important, and by exposing her identity, the leaker destroyed ten years of covert relationship-building and could have jeopardized the lives of other covert agents in the field. At best, it was recklessly irresponsible; at worst, it was malicious; and either way, the leaker undermined our national security.

That's why we, like the President, believe it's time to fire anyone who was involved with the leaking of Plame's name. And now we know that means firing Karl Rove.

Sign our petition now at:
http://www.moveonpac.org/firerove/?id=5782-943837-JD8X9IUVGSKVeWWGzk7LLg&t=2

And thanks for everything you're doing.

Sincerely,
—Eli, Jennifer, Wes, Matt and the MoveOn PAC Team
Tuesday, July 12th, 2005

FOOTNOTES:

1. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8525978/site/newsweek
2. http://www.moveon.org/r?r=776
3. http://www.moveon.org/r?r=777
4. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002374617_leak12.html
5. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/09/print/20030929-7.html
6. http://www.moveon.org/r?r=777
7. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/11/politics/12rove-quotes.html?pagewanted=print
8. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/11/politics/12rove-quotes.html?pagewanted=print
9. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/11/politics/12rove-quotes.html?pagewanted=print
10. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/11/politics/12rove-quotes.html?pagewanted=print
11. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/11/AR2005071100991.html
12. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/11/AR2005071101284.html
13. http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/printrn20030714.shtml

Honestly, I don't know what good a petition will do, but the information should be seen by anyone with an interest in how the game is played in Washington these days. Petty revenge is more important than national security to our "top men". I'd call him a traitor of the highest order, no matter what stripe of politics he is.



1 year ago - perspective via work, kitty-bot, rain, diseases

2 years ago - Movies w/danny, LED-suit, Lupin quiz, dinosaur haiku, new tv, LXG, html tests,ghoulisness

3 years ago - Ian McCracken, zork 404, branleur, got my bike

4 years ago - evil news, longueur, spoliation, space fungus, superstition poll, fri-13 reasoning, I'm Neutral Good

5 years ago - Traditional trolls, Catholics handy in a pinch.

Date: 2005-07-16 10:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dcl.livejournal.com
Did I read right that you have proximity on your palm?

Date: 2005-07-17 03:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
yup! I play it on my flashplayer. :D

http://www.koreus.com/files/200501/proximity.swf

right-click and save as, and then you can play it there, if your palm can do flash.

Date: 2005-07-17 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dcl.livejournal.com
Hmmmm....neat. My palm cannot do flash as far as I know, but I'm going to look into it this morning.

;>

Thanks!!

Date: 2005-07-17 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
Good luck! It's an addictive little game!

Date: 2005-07-17 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dcl.livejournal.com
Heh....looks like Flash isn't out for Palm devices. Sony seems to be the only one to do it.

Oh well. ;>

Date: 2005-07-17 01:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
rats!

I didn't realise it was such a scarcity!

Profile

scottobear: (Default)
scott von berg

April 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2 345678
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 1718 19 20 21 22
23 2425 26 2728 29
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 8th, 2026 02:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios