6930 - Thinking...
Oct. 11th, 2004 01:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
scottobear Should one-legged people take as much offense when something is referred to as "That's so lame" as homosexuals often do when "That's so gay" is used?
I don't use either term, unless it really applies (and especially not "retarded", a fave when I was a kid). The closest I usually come is to use the slang "weak".
Oh, I take that back. I also use queer in the proper context. (Odd / non-standard) That whole "4 hurricanes in a month" thing was mighty queer.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 05:16 pm (UTC)goof ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 05:21 pm (UTC)Worse, I had a Boston Accent.
Whadda-ya? Retahhhhhded, or sumpin?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 05:47 pm (UTC)Wow! That's a wicked awesome army man!!
I probably uttered variations on that a thousand times as a kid.
"Wicked Awesome Hotwheels!!"
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 06:58 pm (UTC)Do you think there are more words for things adored, or things that are loathed? Or is it about equal?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 07:55 pm (UTC)people are too picky.
i use retarded way too much.
well, that's what i am thinking off the top of my head anyways.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 08:48 pm (UTC)I have another one.
Date: 2004-10-11 08:46 pm (UTC)how about phat?
"That's so phat..." Do you think this offend the overweight?
Re: I have another one.
Date: 2004-10-11 08:48 pm (UTC)