(no subject)

[scottobear]

Welcome to Baby Ink, where we believe that it's never to early to start expressing your unique personality through professional, high quality body art. Baby Ink locations are non-threatening, family friendly places where people of all ages can feel calm and at ease. Although we are the ORIGINAL body art chain to cater to toddlers and children, our experienced, talented staff is glad to work on people of all ages. So whether you're 8 months or 88 years old, if you're ready for a tattoo or a body piercing-the clear choice is Baby Ink.

(update, it's a confirmed fraud, but an impressive gag.)

Comments

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

I'm not sure if it's real or not, but was fascinated to see it.

[sandstar.livejournal.com]

I'm all for tattoos, if that is what the person really wants. And can a small child really say that's what they want?

I can't help but think that's what Mommy and Daddy want, and when Baby gets older, he might be mad!

If this isn't a joke, that's some tough little girl that can lay there and get a tat at her age! Usually kids that age are pretty phobic about needles, and being held down for any reason.

I just got my first tat last week - pictures to be posted in my journal when healing is done ;)

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

yeah... they say they use an anesthetic cream, and smaller needles... but who's to say if it's a fakery or not?

[juliabee.livejournal.com]

"that's what Mommy and Daddy want"

That sounds about right to me, too. If I were really into tattoos, I would indulge my child in many temp. play tattoos if they like them that much, with a mention if they're still interested in an adult, I'd be behind them getting one.

Hope to see your tat photos soon :0)

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

yeah.. what's wrong with a litle henna here and there? :)

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

well, if it's legit (I'm dubious, until I see more) I'm against it. I think that sort of thing should be made as a decision by and adult, and only on his own body. I know I'd be peeved if my parents tattooed "mama's little angel" or my grandparents names on my neck.


I can see putting a family crest on, but save it for when the kid is up to making a personal decision.

I do like the idea of having some common tattooo with my brother or chosen mate... but again... not as a kid.

[dstroy.livejournal.com]

I thought it was actually not legal for kids to get real tattoos in the states.

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

from -

http://littlerock.about.com/library/weekly/aa031501a.htm

"Only about 50 percent of all states have these sorts of body modification laws."

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

It was a quick first glance, I figured if I'd not heard about it on the news or something inside of a week, that it was fakery.

Re: Gimmie Da Ting

[peradouro.livejournal.com]

Good, I was feeling very sad about it. I wondered too about the pics because there was no redness, bleeding or swelling. It's a relief that it's not real.

Re: Gimmie Da Ting

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

d'oh!

The truth is out!

[drakainai.livejournal.com]

Tattoos ROCK!!!!!!!

[cath555.livejournal.com]

glad it's a fraud. working at children's aid, I'm kinda torn between parental rights to do what they want with their own kids, and what crosses the line and merits reoving a kid from the parents' care (because we can give dumb parents the swift kick in the ass they really deserve)

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

you and me both!

[juliabee.livejournal.com]

Good to hear it's a fake!

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

I know I'm relieved!