Actually it being mostly liquid kind of surprises me but makes sense as their food is so small. I imagine it's more beneficial to the tiny critters since it wouldn't fall to the bottom or rise to the top. I bet my dad could've pulled off 4 pound poops after he ate at White Castle.
I remember one about the shakes and their "cleaning crews" that ride along and follow.. I wonder how many predator/prey layers follow the waste-stream... is it a tight loop like only 2 or three, or does it go out a dozen long?
Better listen to those Star Trek people then, and keep an eye on them.. how apart would the ecology fall if the whales (and by association, the poop) were removed?
no subject
Date: 2003-05-30 12:51 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-05-30 12:53 pm (UTC)I'm still wondering about it.. that's like a 200 lb man having a 4lb poop a day!
no subject
Date: 2003-05-30 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-30 08:22 pm (UTC)Via boingboing.net:
http://members.shaw.ca/tom.t/unh/index.html
Re:
Date: 2003-05-30 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-30 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-30 08:27 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-05-31 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-31 11:20 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-05-31 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-31 11:38 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-05-31 11:42 am (UTC)It must be like finding a giant grocery store with an "all you can carry for free" sign when they hit that stream of whale-waste.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-31 11:44 am (UTC)One critter's "All you can eat" is another bigger critter's "All you can catch."
Re:
Date: 2003-05-31 11:46 am (UTC)Now you make me wonder how closely the poo-eater-eaters follow behind the whales, looking for another snack bar. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-05-31 11:52 am (UTC)I saw something on the Discovery Channel about that...how animals for "partnerships" and benefit from another animals behaviors and so forth.
Re:
Date: 2003-05-31 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-31 12:08 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-05-31 12:10 pm (UTC)