sweetalyssm got me thinking about random journals.
Jul. 16th, 2001 03:23 pmI long for customized random search buttons. The random journal as it is now doesn't do a lot for me, as my interests are usually a bit different than the average LJ-er, (according to statistics, the average LJ-er is a 16 year old girl... I'm Double that age and a male (worse, I'm a pod-person)). What I'd like to see is the user search engine return soon, so you can type in parameters. (and I'd like to add a parameter... "no foul language or l33t" text in a post. That way I could bypass the folks on a rant, or talking smack pseudo script-kiddy code. (and folks could find the same, if they wanted to read that stuff.) Heck, in the theme of Chris's recent post, I wonder if there's a clean way to implement a message size one, too.. "must contain at least 10 words" or whatever. I bet there is. (that'd snip out my Cap'n Kirk Joke...) Or, for example, have it cut out journals that use phrases or people you don't like... (For example, don't use anyone already on my friends list, or my blocked list, or anyone who uses too many ellipses (...'s, a guilty pleasure I partake in myself.)
The random feature hasn't helped me find any journals I like to read in a long time. However, the interests list, and mutual communities are a great idea for mining for new folks. Stef's latest idea of describing a friend and having you guess about them is another great idea.

The random feature hasn't helped me find any journals I like to read in a long time. However, the interests list, and mutual communities are a great idea for mining for new folks. Stef's latest idea of describing a friend and having you guess about them is another great idea.
no subject
Date: 2001-07-16 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-07-16 01:00 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-16 01:02 pm (UTC)take a peek at
Re:
Date: 2001-07-16 01:03 pm (UTC)Re: Yeah, I Can Agree --
Date: 2001-07-16 01:16 pm (UTC)Re: Yeah, I Can Agree --
Date: 2001-07-16 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-07-17 04:45 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 06:03 am (UTC)you then get
thanks for the link!
Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:35 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:36 pm (UTC)*boo*
:)
Hope that's ok!
Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:44 pm (UTC)it's fine, I'm always pleased to be acknowledged and remembered and stuff!
I used to scream when my manager would knock on my cubicle... I just startle easily :)
Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:45 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:47 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:48 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:53 pm (UTC)(just teasing... I'm 4 or 5 months older than you are, or something)
Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:54 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:56 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 12:57 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 01:00 pm (UTC)though of course you *couldn't* have played the first round...
Re:
Date: 2001-07-17 01:08 pm (UTC)why couldn't I play? privatE?
Re:
Date: 2001-07-21 07:55 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2001-07-21 08:22 am (UTC)