(no subject)

[scottobear]

I will say one thing. I won't proselytize for the LJ, until folks can post and read comfortably. after that, call me minister scotto of the LJ tabernacle. :)

Comments

[papoose.livejournal.com]

Right On!

[laurak.livejournal.com]

Lemme hear an aaaaaaaaaa-men!

Amen, Rev. Scotto! ;-)

Praise be to the LJ.

hehehe

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

gimme a Yea-ah!!

[laurak.livejournal.com]

Yea-ahhh!!!!!!!

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

ooh. :) this could be lucrative. :)

Buy another year's membership to LJ!

and a cookie, please?

[bandicoot.livejournal.com]

Aw, relax folks. They're listening and working on improving things. When you change from specifying font size in HTML to doing it in CSS, you're going to run into problems. They're resolvable. And we're seeing development work in action with all the plusses and minuses it entails.

Just think what it would be like if AOL was running LJ and this was their final product. Do you think your voice would mean diddly?

Re:

[scottobear.livejournal.com]

Oh, I agree. I love the service. (but my point is, advertising for it while it's limping, would probably drive more people away. Once it's at a reasonable funtionality, I'll go back to singing it's praises.)