scottobear: (Default)
scott von berg ([personal profile] scottobear) wrote2001-06-26 03:11 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Always a fascinating list: Top 100 Banned or Challenged Books of 1990-1999. But why Of Mice and Men is banned more often than Catcher in the Rye is beyond me.

[identity profile] sida-al-hurra.livejournal.com 2001-06-26 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Un-believable. I'd like to know the reason some of them are on that list. Course, I'm gonna run out and buy a copy of all the ones I don't already have ; )

Re:

[identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com 2001-06-26 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)
*laughs

Many you can get from the gutenberg project. :)

free text files. :)

[identity profile] sida-al-hurra.livejournal.com 2001-06-26 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yeah, cool. Thanks for that link.

Re:

[identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com 2001-06-26 01:29 pm (UTC)(link)
quite welcome! :)

[identity profile] purple.livejournal.com 2001-06-26 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
you know, for any writer on that list, it must be great to know that one of their books was so questionable/*uh i forget the other word i was going to use!* that it had to be banned.
and i read Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson In 5th grade, for school.

ahhh this list is pissing me off!

Re:

[identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com 2001-06-27 07:01 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry to bug you!

I liked a lot of the books on the list, too.

Re:

[identity profile] purple.livejournal.com 2001-06-27 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)
the part that bugged me the most was that some people who hadnt read the book, wanted it banned.

Re:

[identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com 2001-06-28 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
yeah, looking for key elements, like suicide, or drug use...